According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), there’s actually only one way to be 100% certain of a correct diagnosis—the only sign or symptom unique to Lyme disease: the “bull’s eye” rash that sometimes follows an infectious tick bite. It might show up between 3 and 30 days afterwards. If it does, it usually lasts between 3 and 5 weeks.
Immediate antibiotic treatment upon noticing it might prevent a lifetime of needless suffering. In fact, you do NOT need a blood test if you had the rash, since it is the cardinal sign of Lyme disease. Long ago, both the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health urged doctors to diagnose Lyme based on a combination of detailed medical history (including past knowledge of tick bites) and physical exam.
“Valid laboratory tests can be very helpful but are not generally recommended when a patient has Erythema migrans [bull’s eye rash]" - The Centers for Disease Control
The problem is that legions of sufferers of chronic pain and illness do not recall a tick bite and/or the characteristic rash. In my experience very few people get a rash at all!
The infected ticks are tiny and easy to miss— about the size of a poppy seed. Plus their bite is usually painless! What sickens me is how frequently patients tell me they went to another doctor years in the past, presenting with a tick bite and a rash, but were NOT given a prescription for antibiotics, and they were told not to worry about it! This is medical irresponsibility, which can result in a lifetime of suffering and illness.
Doctors prescribe antibiotics with reckless abandon for every cough, cold, earache, sinus drip and fever—for ailments that are most likely viral in origin, just in case. But NOT for suspected Lyme disease?
This is profoundly disturbing, and in my opinion, it’s criminally malpractice.
If you remember (at any time in your life) getting a tick bite and/or seeing an expanding red rash (it doesn’t have to look like a bull’s eye!), you should seek care with a doctor experienced in helping Lyme patients.
Ignorance is NOT bliss; Ignorance is DISEASE
Many years ago, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) suggested up to 12 times more cases of Lyme exist than they previously reported. I think it is WAY more common, since the medically established blood tests are often falsely negative. The diagnostic criteria are very firm. One must have enough positive bands to be diagnosed with Lyme. Imagine how many people have Lyme disease, but don't know it, thus it's never reported.
How can tests this dreadful become medicine’s gold standard for diagnosis?
The tests were designed primarily for statistics rather than diagnosis, and have not been improved. I often wonder when I see Western Blot results revealing only some of the necessary positive Borrelia band, does this poor soul only have a little bit of Lyme? Do pregnancy tests come up as partially pregnant?
Years ago, the findings of Virginia's Lyme Task Force appointed by past Governor Bob McDonnell suggest that NO blood test is capable of ruling out Lyme disease! It was written into Virginia law that doctors must inform patients that negative blood tests do NOT rule out Lyme disease.
Is there a police officer at the door of every medical office interrogating doctors to see if they’re complying with the law?