Tracking True Progress

When most people think about “weight loss,” they imagine one number: their body weight. That lone figure has shaped public perception for generations, even though it is among the least precise measurements in modern health. A scale cannot distinguish your bones from your organs, your hydration status from your muscle mass, or your fat from the food you ate that morning. It simply reports a total, and that total is often misleading.

At the Liebell Clinic, especially within our Zerona VZ8 program, measurement is treated as a science, not a guessing game. If we are using advanced, physics-based technology to help patients mobilize stubborn fat, we must measure results with tools that reflect real physiology rather than outdated simplifications. This article explains what we measure, why each measurement matters, and how body fat analysis, tape measurements, waist-to-height ratios, and even the antiquated BMI fit into a modern, accurate, individualized program that tracks your true progress.

Body weight reflects everything within you at that moment: water, bone, muscle, organs, fat, and whatever happens to be inside your digestive tract. If you drink a large glass of water, the scale can rise. If you sweat or get dehydrated, the scale can fall. These fluctuations tell you nothing about actual fat reduction. Decades of research demonstrate that what truly predicts health risk is not simply weight, but how much fat you carry, where that fat is distributed, and how responsive your metabolism is to lifestyle changes. That is why the scale is only one tool among many, and never the only one we use.

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a basic ratio of weight to height squared. It was never intended to diagnose individual health. It was created in the nineteenth century as a population-level statistic, long before modern imaging, physiology research, or the understanding of how fat distribution affects disease risk. However, medical systems continue to use BMI because it is quick, cheap, and familiar. Modern scientific reviews repeatedly show that BMI is inadequate as an individual assessment tool.

BMI has several critical flaws. It does not distinguish muscle from fat. It does not reflect where fat is stored. It does not account for age, sex, ethnicity, bone density, or fitness level. A muscular athlete can be labeled “obese,” while an individual with low muscle and high visceral fat can appear “normal.” A perfect illustration comes from my friend Michael. He served on missions with Navy SEALS decades ago. He was a competitive bodybuilder with exceptional strength, minimal body fat, and the physique of a real-life action figure. Yet the Navy forced him into a “fat” program because his BMI classified him as obese. A measurement that could not distinguish muscle from fat misidentified one of the fittest men imaginable. BMI is basic math imposed upon a not-so-basic human being.

This is exactly why the Liebell Clinic uses modern metrics that reflect who you are, not outdated formulas that reflect who someone else was in the nineteenth century. Your measurements should be tied to your physiology, not an antiquated population average. Global expert panels now agree and have called for obesity to be defined with actual body fat measures, waist indices, and metabolic impact, rather than BMI alone. We calculate BMI because the medical world still expects it, but we do not assign it undue importance.

If we are concerned about fat, we must measure fat. The ideal laboratory tools—DEXA scans and MRI—are precise but impractical for routine use. Instead, we use validated, reliable bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) through our Omron body fat devices. BIA sends a tiny electrical current through the body. Lean tissue conducts electricity faster because it contains more water and electrolytes. Fat tissue resists the current. By comparing impedance patterns, the device estimates body fat percentage, fat mass, and lean mass. 

Research shows that consumer-grade BIA devices are highly reliable when used consistently, even if they differ slightly from gold-standard lab devices. A major study examining fifteen consumer BIA units found that although absolute values may vary between devices, they are very reliable for tracking changes over time—the exact purpose they serve in our clinic.

This is how we use them: not to argue over decimal places, but to monitor fat trends during Zerona treatment, dietary improvements, and increased physical activity.

The tape measure may look outdated, but modern research continues to validate its power. Waist circumference, hip circumference, and their relationship to height strongly correlate with both total and visceral fat, and with the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. 

Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), calculated by dividing your waist measurement by your height, has repeatedly been one of the best simple predictors of visceral fat and cardiometabolic risk. A 2017 DEXA-based study confirmed that WHtR outperformed BMI in predicting both whole-body fat percentage and visceral fat.³ Another study of more than 36,000 adults found that WHtR identified high-risk individuals even when their BMI appeared normal.

Tape measurements tell the truth about shape. They capture the exact changes that patients want to see—especially during Zerona treatments that target stubborn fat regions.

When patients begin their Zerona VZ8 program, Laser Therapist, Evan Liebell and our clinical team record a series of metrics that work together to provide an accurate, individualized picture of progress:

1. Body weight:  Used for overall context, not as the sole measure of success. Interpreted    within hydration, muscle gain, digestion, and fluid shifts.
2. Body Mass Index: Recorded for completeness and compatibility with medical records, but never treated as a primary indicator of fat or health. 
3. Bioelectrical impedance body fat analysis: Conducted with consistent timing and hydration. Provides body fat percentage, fat mass, and lean mass. Validated by research for reliable trend monitoring.
4. Tape measurements and body shape indices: Includes waist circumference, hip circumference, thigh circumference, and sometimes upper arm or treatment-specific sites. Calculates waist-to-height ratio and other indices, providing insight into central fat distribution and shape change.
5. Photographic documentation (with consent): Provides the clearest visual record of silhouette change. The camera does not care about BMI; it captures reality.

Zerona VZ8 is a photochemical, physics-driven technology. It uses low-level laser wavelengths to create temporary pores in fat-cell membranes, allowing stored triglycerides to be released and processed naturally by the body. This process affects fat mass and circumference before it affects total “weight,” which is why the scale is often the least sensitive tool during early treatment phases.

Tape measurements shrink. Body fat percentage trends downward. Waist-to-height ratio improves. But the scale may remain almost unchanged for days or weeks because it reflects many other biological processes unrelated to fat release. Research shows that waist measures and body fat percentage correlate more strongly with cardiometabolic health than BMI does. These are the measurements that matter most to health, risk reduction, clothing fit, and visible shape improvement.

There is a global shift underway away from BMI as the dominant measure of obesity and toward a multidimensional, physiologically accurate approach. Expert groups have formally recommended defining obesity by body fat levels, waist measures, and metabolic health rather than BMI alone. The Liebell Clinic already follows this approach. We document BMI because the healthcare system still expects it, but we rely on real measurements—your body fat percentage, your circumferences, your waist-to-height ratio, and your actual physical changes—to guide your Zerona care. These data represent your true physiology, not someone else’s outdated assumptions.

Your body is not a simple equation, and your health should not be judged by a single, antiquated mathematical formula. At the Liebell Clinic, we use modern, physics-based technology alongside accurate, validated measurement tools to track changes where they matter most: in your fat mass, your shape, your waistline, and your metabolic risk profile.

Weight alone is not the story. Your physiology is the story. We measure the truth, not the tradition.

1. Barreira TV, Staiano AE, Harrington DM, et al.      Anthropometric correlates of total body fat, abdominal adiposity, and      cardiovascular disease risk factors in a biracial sample of men and women.      Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(5):452-460. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.017
2. Li WC, Chen IC, Chang YC, et al. Waist-to-height      ratio, waist circumference, and body mass index as indices of      cardiometabolic risk among 36,642 Taiwanese adults. Eur J Nutr.      2013;52(1):57-65. doi:10.1007/s00394-011-0286-0
3. Swainson MG, Batterham AM, Tsakirides C, Rutherford      ZH, Hind K. Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose      tissue mass from five anthropometric variables. PLoS One.      2017;12(5):e0177175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177175
4. Callahan EA. The Science, Strengths, and Limitations      of Body Mass Index (BMI). In: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,      and Medicine. Understanding and Overcoming the Challenges of Obesity and      Overweight in the United States. National Academies Press; 2023.
5. Wu Y, Li D, Vermund SH. Advantages and limitations of      the body mass index (BMI) to assess adult obesity. Int J Environ Res      Public Health. 2024;21(6):757. doi:10.3390/ijerph21060757
6. Sweatt K, Garvey WT, Martins C. Strengths and      limitations of BMI in the diagnosis of obesity: what is the path forward?      Curr Obes Rep. 2024;13(4):584-595. doi:10.1007/s13679-024-00580-1
7. Rubino F, Busetto L, et al. Definition and diagnostic      criteria of clinical obesity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.      2025;13(3):221-262. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00316-4
8. Omron Healthcare. Body Composition Monitor and Scale:      How is body fat calculated? Accessed November 2025.
9. Siedler MR, et al. Assessing the reliability and      cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of fifteen bioelectrical      impedance analysis devices. Br J Nutr. 2023;130(5):827-840.      doi:10.1017/S0007114522003749
10. Bosy-Westphal A, et al. Accuracy of bioelectrical      impedance consumer devices for body composition assessment. Clin Nutr.      2008;27(5):771-777. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003
11. Roriz AKC, Passos LCS, de Oliveira CC, et al.      Anthropometric clinical indicators in the assessment of visceral obesity:      an update. Nutr Clin Diet Hosp. 2016;36(2):168-179.
12. Cai L, Liu A, Zhang Y, Wang P. Waist-to-height ratio      and cardiovascular risk factors among Chinese adults in Beijing. PLoS One.      2013;8(7):e69298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069298
13. Yoo EG. Waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for      obesity and cardiometabolic risk. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2016;59(5):183-187.      doi:10.3345/kjp.2016.59.5.183